This question pertains to Site A in the Study Sites map, which is the area at the intersection of Falls of Neuse Road and Raven Ridge Road. Two concepts are shown. Concept 1 envisions a mix of office and residential uses. Concept 2 is similar, but adds 10,000 square feet of retail space to the mix.

Question title

1. Which concept do you believe best fits and serves Site A?

Concept 1
73%
Concept 2
27%
Closed to responses | 129 Responses

This area is at the intersection of Falls of Neuse and Dunn roads. Most of the undeveloped land here is zoned for a retirement community. Zoning on the remaining land, approximately four acres, allows a limited amount of retail uses and space.

Question title

2. Are there other uses you would like to see at Site B?

Closed for Comments

This area includes areas adjacent to the existing dentist’s office on the east side of Falls of Neuse Road, just north of High Holly Lane.  The concept shows potential office and residential uses, with office buildings limited to two stories and with architectural features that would be consistent with adjacent residential buildings.

Question title

3. Do you have other thoughts about Site C? What are they?

Closed for Comments

This area includes several larger residential parcels that obtain access directly from Falls of Neuse Road. Existing policy guidance designates the area as suitable for office and residential uses. The two scenarios shown below focus solely on residential uses. The first envisions low-density residential uses, likely detached houses; the second envisions moderate-density residential development, with the possibility of townhouses, though not apartments.

Question title

4. Which scenario do you think best fits and serves Site D?

Concept 1
71%
Concept 2
29%
Closed to responses | 115 Responses

This site involves the small existing commercial area near Falls Lake Dam, at the intersection of Fonville Road and Old Falls of Neuse Road. Both scenarios envision retaining and improving that area. Concept 1 would keep the existing physical boundaries of the commercial area. Concept 2 would add approximately two acres to the commercial area to allow for the potential of a restaurant or other uses that would serve greenway or other recreational users in the area. Concept 2 would include guidance for design so that any new structures would fit into the context of the area.

Question title

5. Which scenario do you think best fits and serves Site E?

Concept 1
50%
Concept 2
50%
Closed to responses | 115 Responses

This final site involves city-owned property near the intersection of Falls of Neuse Road and Old Falls of Neuse Road. City property to the north of that intersection (the Leonard Tract, which includes land on both sides of Falls of Neuse Road from Old Falls of Neuse road to the river), is already designated for future park development. This scenario involves designating two additional parcels at the southwest corner of the intersection as Public Parks and Open Space.

Question title

6. Do you have any other thoughts about Site F?

Closed for Comments

Several participants in the plan process have suggested that the identity of this area stems from the large number of natural and recreational resources, including the Neuse River Greenway, Annie Louise Wilkerson, M.D. Nature Reserve, Forest Ridge Park, Falls Lake, and of course the Neuse River itself. Participants have suggested that identity could be strengthened by having a name that reflects the characteristics of the area.

Question title

7. How would you describe or what would you name this part of Raleigh?

Closed for Comments

Question title

8. What other thoughts do you have about these scenarios or other issues in the project area?

Closed for Comments