Question title

Please provide your comments on recreational salmon fisheries for 2022-23 in ocean areas.

Closed for Comments
Must not remove salmon to be released from the water.
ReplyAgree2 years ago
I support option #1. However, need to say that the way the MA2 chinook quota was managed last year was an absolute travesty. Almost 50% of the chinook quota remained when the season closed? Complete mismanagement of the quota! Closer attention needs to be paid to this. Make the l...See More
ReplyAgree3 years ago
I specifically take part grays harbor in river fisheries more than anywhere else in Washington. However closures and fishing restrictions year after year have forced me to travel further and further from home to fish. Most recently most of my steelhead season was spent fishing in...See More
ReplyAgree3 years ago
I support alternative 1 for marine areas 1-4.
ReplyAgree3 years ago
When is wdfw going to get their act together. A 6 week season in area 7 with the potential to be shut down early is a complete joke, especially when one considers that you can drive less then 5 miles from most fishing spots in the San Juan’s to Canada and fish almost year round. ...See More
ReplyAgree3 years ago

Please refer to the proposed rule making document: North of Falcon Recreational Fishing CR102

Visit the North of Falcon page for more information.

You can add comments into the text boxes under each tab, or e-mail the comments with or without attachments to 2022NoFRecreationalCR102@PublicInput.com or leave a voicemail message by calling 855-925-2801 and entering project code 3823.

Please note:  All comments received by WDFW are part of the public record and will be made available for public viewing - so please do not include private information in the text of your comments.