Our goal: The King County Wastewater Treatment Division (WTD) is considering updating the basis of its capacity charge to better reflect the types of housing our region is building today. WTD levies a 15-year capacity charge for all new connections to the sewer system. This helps pay for the wastewater system—pipes, treatment plants and other facilities—that serves a growing region. Our mission is to protect public health and enhance the environment by collecting and treating wastewater while recycling valuable resources for the Puget Sound region.

Since the capacity charge program began in 1990, King County has experienced significant growth and change (the current rate design was approved in 2001). We are seeing a wider range of residential building types: multi-unit, microhousing, and accessory dwelling units like basement apartments and backyard cottages. It’s time to re-evaluate the approach for allocating the capacity charge among today’s building types. We want to develop a basis for the capacity charge that reflects the relative amount of wastewater each type of unit sends to the sewer and is administratively workable. Visit our frequently asked questions for more information on the capacity charge.

Current status: The capacity charge is based on building type (for residential) and the number of plumbing fixtures (for commercial). (We are not proposing any changes for commercial buildings.)  

For residential buildings, a single detached home is considered one residential customer. The capacity charges for other types of residences—for example multi-unit, accessory dwelling units, or microhousing—are based on a percentage of one residential customer equivalent (RCE). Most of the percentages of an RCE assigned to a different rate classification were established in 2001. The King County Council established an interim rate classification for accessory dwelling units in June 2019.

Proposal: The proposal would use data from the U.S. Census Bureau and other housing surveys on the average persons per household (PPH) to set the percentage of one RCE for each type of residence. Using PPH would reflect the relative amount of wastewater each type of unit sends to the sewer. Using survey data means the capacity charge basis can be updated regularly to reflect new housing trends as new data become available.

Two options: We are considering two options that primarily differ in how single detached dwelling units would be charged. We could continue to have one category for all single detached  homes or create three categories for small, medium, and large single detached homes. Small homes would pay less for the capacity charge and large homes would pay more. The data show that three categories would better reflect the average PPH and, therefore, the amount of wastewater a home is likely to send to the sewer. However, it adds some administrative complexity.

The following table presents estimates of how much the capacity charge (paid monthly) for residential buildings would cost by each option, including the current rate structure:   

Estimated total capacity charge by option based on 2020 monthly capacity charge

Building categories

Current

Option 1

Option 2

Single detached (all)

$66.35

$65.52

-

Single detached (<1,500 sq. ft.)

$66.35

$65.52

$53.46

Single detached (1,500 – 2,999 sq. ft.)

$66.35

$65.52

$66.00

Single detached (≥3,000 sq. ft.)

$66.35

$65.52

$76.56

Multi-unit (2 to 4 units)

$53.08

$55.03

$53.46

Multi-unit (5 units)

$42.46

$42.58

$41.58

Accessory dwelling units

$39.81

$39.96

$38.94

Microhousing

$23.22

$23.59

$23.10

The table below presents the percentages of one RCE that would be used to determine the capacity charge for each type of building. The current RCE percentages closely resemble the percentages that are based on survey data. So, in fact, there would be little change. However, using survey data means the capacity charge basis can be updated regularly to reflect new housing trends as new data become available.

 

Current

Option 1

Option 2

Basis for RCE

Historical

Persons per household

Persons per household

Base unit

Single detached (all)

Single detached (all)

1 RCE = 2.79 PPH

Single detached (medium)

1 RCE = 2.88 PPH

Single detached

All = 1 RCE

All = 1 RCE

Small[1] = 0.81 RCE

Medium = 1 RCE

Large = 1.16 RCE

Multi-unit

2 to 4 units = 0.8 RCE

5 units = 0.64 RCE

2 to 4 units = 0.84 RCE

5 units = 0.65 RCE

2 to 4 units = 0.81 RCE

5 units = 0.63 RCE

Detached accessory dwelling units[2]

0.6 RCE

0.61 RCE

0.59 RCE

Attached accessory dwelling units

0.6 RCE

0.61 RCE

0.59 RCE

Microhousing

Fixture count, approximately 0.35 RCE

0.36 RCE

0.35 RCE

Commercial buildings

20 fixture units = 1 RCE

20 fixture units = 1 RCE

20 fixture units = 1 RCE

 

[1] In this example, single detached units are categorized as small (<1,500 sq. ft.), medium (1,500 – 2,999 sq. ft.), and large (≥3,000 sq. ft.).

[2] Detached accessory dwelling units are less than 1,000 sq. ft.

Question title

* What do you think about using the average persons per household as the basis for the residential customer equivalent (RCE)?

The current basis for the RCE was established in 2001 based on a national survey of municipalities and sewer agency approaches.

This proposal would use data from the U.S. Census Bureau and other housing surveys on the average persons per household to set the percentage of one RCE for each type of residence. Using PPH would reflect the relative amount of wastewater each type of unit sends to the sewer. Using survey data means the capacity charge basis can be updated regularly to reflect new housing trends as new data become available. For more information, view the rate design report.

Closed for Comments

Question title

* What do you think about Option 1: having one charge for all single detached homes, regardless of square footage? What value is there in this approach? What concerns do you have?

Example: A 1,000 sq. ft. house pays the same as a 3,000 sq. ft. house.

Closed for Comments

Question title

* What do you think about Option 2: having different charges for single detached homes based on small, medium or large square footage? What value is there in this approach? What concerns do you have?

Example: A 1,000 sq. ft. house pays less than a 3,000 sq. ft. house.

Closed for Comments

Question title

Do you have any other questions, comments or concerns about the options or the capacity charge rate design study?

Closed for Comments

Thank you for your feedback. If you'd like to join the capacity charge studies mailing list, contact Eunice Lee at elee@kingcounty.gov. For more information, visit King County's capacity charge studies page.