Question title

* What is your full name? (This information may be included with your comments in the staff report sent to the Planning Commission.)

Your privately-submitted comments:
Closed to responses

Question title

* What is your current residential address? (This information may be included with your comments in the staff report sent to the Planning Commission.)

Your privately-submitted comments:
Closed for Comments

Question title

Do you have any questions about this text change? If so, ask in the comment box below. We will be sure to respond to your question here. Please note that your question is public and can be seen by others.

Closed for Comments
Strongly agree with these provisions. Having the flexibility to use residential property in more diverse ways is needed in all growing cities. Allowing townhomes in R4 is huge. An example of how the current rules are hurting us. My company owns a legacy double lot consisting of 2...See More
Reply11 Agree3 years ago
I believe this is a positive step towards adding more diverse housing options, encouraging transit and density that will fit in the neighborhood surroundings and create jobs and small business opportunities. Allowing additional housing along transit will ultimately encourage less...See More
Reply5 Agree3 years ago
I purchased my home through the affordable housing program. The deed restrictions make it highly unlikely that a bank would allow me to use the large equity stake I have to finance an adu project without the city taking a subordinate position on the loan. Would the city be willin...See More
Reply4 Agree3 years ago
The "flag lot" provisions here would provide you with an option to add a detached Tiny Home on your lot without jeopardizing your existing financing arrangement.
2 Agree3 years ago
The city should quit gifting building lots worth hundreds of thousands of dollars and switch to long-term land-leases for its affordable housing program. Please consider how much more sustainable the program would be.
1 Agree3 years ago
The restrictions of zoning and the restrictions of deeds are separate. Even if the zoning allows something, deed restrictions can prevent that type of development or apply extra requirements. That being said, your question contains an interesting proposal that staff will need so...See More
3 years ago
Would these new homes be for renting only? Or would we be able to purchase them? Also, what would you do to ensure that prices are kept affordable and not inflated by the owners? Just because they're smaller doesn't mean they'll automatically be kept affordable, there's plenty of...See More
Reply1 Agree3 years ago
These proposed changes are to the City’s regulations. A person or company wishing to construct them would continue to have the option to sell or rent them just as they do today for a traditional detached house, attached house, townhouse or multi-family development. Only the dwe...See More
3 years ago
It is not a question, but a comment. Missing Middle 2.0 picks up where TC-5-20 left off. The additional changes will destroy older neighborhoods by allowing indiscriminate placement of town homes and duplexes in R-4 neighborhoods, without any special notice to existing homes on e...See More
ReplyAgree3 years ago

Question title

Do you have any comments about this text change? If so, leave them in the comments box below. Please note that your comments will not be visible to others on this platform but will be public record presented to the Planning Commission.

Your privately-submitted comments:
Closed for Comments