Zilker Park Overall

The Zilker Park Vision Plan is a complicated puzzle with many pieces. Each of the pieces, or design alternatives, could be shaped in a variety of ways. Your input will drive the direction for the plan and how the puzzle ultimately comes together.

This page includes questions for overall park preferences as well as summaries of themes definitions of terms used throughout each park zone.

Question title

In general there are three ways to organize activities at Zilker.

How would you like to see programming in the park distributed?

Nodes: Create areas of activity within the park, and utilize some of the underused parts of the park for park programming, while keeping other spaces for less activity
49%
Leave the Zilker Park programming as it is today
24%
Dispersed: Evenly distribute programming throughout the park, utilizing as much of the park as possible for programming
14%
Concentrated: toward the east end of the park, near the pool and Great Lawn
11%
Other
2%
Closed to responses | 740 Responses

Question title

Would you like food and vendor options at Zilker?

Yes, but limited to 1 or 2 areas
46%
No
29%
Yes, multiple options throughout the park
21%
Unsure
3%
Other
1%
Closed to responses | 870 Responses

Visitor Hub

One idea that has been put forward in the past and may have value for Zilker Park is the idea of a Visitor Hub. Such a hub would be a major point of orientation for visitor to the park. It might contain educational or interpretive displays or be a staging area for recreational or educational programming for youth, seniors, or visitors or all ages. This could be a new structure or buidling or could be accomplished by repurposing an existing building such as the Zilker Clubhouse, Quonset Hut, Caretakers Cottage, or Girl Scout Hut.

 

Question title

Would you like to see a visitor hub that fulfills the goals mentioned above?

No, Zilker does not need a visitor hub.
48%
Yes. I prefer to explore options at existing structures in the park.
24%
Yes. I am open to either option (A or B).
19%
Yes. I prefer to explore options for a new structure.
9%
Closed to responses | 598 Responses

Question title

If you are interested in a potential visitor hub, which location(s) do you think should be explored for a visitor hub? (select all that apply)

Zilker Map with possible visitor hub locations
I do not want to see a visitor hub
42%
Option 3: Connection to Barton Springs (utilizing Caretaker's Cottage or Quonset Hut or new structure nearby)
21%
Option 6: Entry to park from Barton Springs Road
21%
Option 5: Near the Zilker Botanical Garden and Austin Nature and Science Center (north)
12%
Option 1: Utilizing Zilker Clubhouse
11%
Option 7: Connection to Dougherty Arts Center and Butler Shores (east)
10%
Option 4: Connecting Nature Preserve area (Rollingwood Drive entry)
10%
Option 2: South Park Gateway (utilizing Girl Scout Hut or McBeth Recreation Center)
6%
Other location
2%
Closed to responses | 475 Responses

Question title

Visitor hubs range in complexity and size. Please rank the options below for preferred type of visitor hub.

Visitor Hub with images of types: signage kiosk seating area shaded pavilion building
Closed to responses | 437 Responses

Question title

If you would like to see a visitor hub at Zilker, what elements would you like to see at a visitor hub? (select all that apply)

Restrooms
78%
Environmental Interpretation
56%
Park Orientation
52%
Historical Interpretation
48%
Food and Beverage
27%
Sports, Educational, Events Desk
21%
Park Offices
15%
Meeting Rooms
9%
Other
8%
Closed to responses | 414 Responses

Gateways

Gateways can be valuable for orienting people to Zilker Park: What are the park activities, facilities, and expectations for visitors? They may be points for access to a park circulator system, restrooms, signage and wayfinding, and other park amenities. These gateways typically take two forms: (1) physical gateways which may contain an architectural element or formal gate, park signage, or artwork, or (2) more modest threshold which may be marked by a change in paving material or more modest demarcation. The questions below will guide the Zilker Vision team on where gateways could be and what form they could take.

Question title

Where would you like to see gateways into Zilker provided? (Select all that apply)

Gateways: Locations
Near Barton Springs Road bridge
45%
Frontage Road transition to Barton Springs Road near existing disc golf area
34%
None of the above
29%
Near Nature and Science Center and Botanical Garden
27%
South of Barton Springs Pool off of Azie Morton Drive
23%
Near Toomey Road extension
14%
Near Girl Scout Hut
9%
Other
3%
Closed to responses | 507 Responses

Question title

Gateways can range in size and intensity from a large physical gateway to a threshold that may consist of a change in paving or surface material or other subtle changes.

Please identify your preferred type of gateway for each of the following areas being considered.

Gateway types with images: Physical gateway and threshold
Loading question...

Question title

Additional Thoughts
Please share any comments around possible Visitor Hub or Gateways. (Additional opportunities remain for each page theme.)

Closed for Comments

Ecology and Nature

The ecology and nature of the park as it is today and what it could be serves as a foundational element of the planning process. How do we achieve greater biodiversity, better wildlife habitat, better stormwater integration, and a park that is more prepared to deal with climate change.

Ecological Uplift

Ecological Uplift is the process or enhancing ecological systems ina  landscape where they may not exist, are impaired, or simply can be improved. The primary plant communities and habitats found at Zilker Riparian Woodland, Upland Woodland, Savanna, and Meadow.

Image of plant community examples of upland woodland, riparian woodland, savanna, meadow

An ecological uplift approach in parts of the park allows us to make Zilker a part of the solution when it comes to climate change in Austin. By enhancing and restoring native plant communities, Zilker can help us adapt and mitigate the impacts of climate change. This concept of additional restored open space provides a refuge from climate change and fits with the directive of the recently adopted climate equity plan as well as other city policies and programs.

For the questions below, please refer to the following definitions:

  • Current Maintenance includes contininuing the current levels of mowing (regular, seasonal, no mowing) and ongoing care of trees with active management, which occurs mostly in mowed areas.
  • More Mowed Park is the scenario where areas currently seasonally mowed increase in frequency and areas used as temporary parking are planted with turf grass and maintained regularly as turf. Active management occurs mostly in mowed areas.
  • Ecological Uplift goes beyond the minimal efforts to expand the current areas and may change current function of some programming areas. More shade and stormwater management create a better user experience and increase ecological function in active park areas. Unused mowed areas are ecologically restored. Woodlands, savannas, and meadows are managed to increase their health.  This scenario creates more chances to enjoy nature, increases biodiversity, reduces stormwater impacts, and addresses climate change.
  • Ecological Uplift Plus prioritizes enhancing ecological systems, building further on Ecological Uplift. This scenario expands ecological restoration into some active park areas where those activities can be accommodated in other parts of the park or other parks.

Question title

What are you most curious in exploring further regarding Ecology?

Ecological uplift throughout the park
59%
Options for the landfill site
18%
Climate change mitigation and adaptation
10%
Green stormwater infrastructure throughout the park
9%
Other
4%
Closed to responses | 445 Responses

Question title

What is your preferred ecological plan for Zilker Park as a whole?

Ecological Uplift Plus
42%
Ecological Uplift
37%
Current Maintenance
14%
Mowed More
7%
Closed to responses | 508 Responses

Question title

Additional Thoughts
Please share any additional comments about ecology and nature.

Closed for Comments

Mobility, Connectivity, Transportation

The Vision Plan will address all modes of access: walking, rolling, accessibility, vehicles, public transit, and emerging options. Right now, if you’re not driving to the park, access options are fairly limited despite the park's central location. The questions below explore concepts and options for your feedback. The mobility concepts can be combined and assembled in various ways to respond to the other design concepts being considered.

Active Transportation

Starting with active transportation – walking, biking, rolling – there are many opportunities to improve the comfort, safety, and accessibility of the existing mobility system, which is currently less than ideal in many places. Zilker Park touches two of Austin’s most revered trails: the Ann and Roy Butler Hike and Bike Trail and the Greenbelt/Violet Crown Trails. Increasing visibility and providing intuitive access points for both is key to better integrating the park to the rest of the city.

A dedicated pedestrian network within the park will also improve safety and comfort. Concepts such as a recreational loop into the park will be explored as part of the mobility network for the future of Zilker Park.

Finally, safe crossings of Barton Springs Road will be a critical component of all active transportation concepts as well as options from the north side of Lady Bird Lake where there is a greater than 1 mile gap between the Roberta Crenshaw bridge and the Pfluger Pedestrian bridge.

Public Transportation, Drop-offs and Park Circulator

The project team is exploring the potential for additional connectivity between the Park and other parts of the city. Currently, there is only one way to get to the park today via transit, which is the 30-minute frequency Route 30 that connects to downtown and Southwest Austin. The route is mainly used to access the mall with ridership within the park being very low, even with recent promotions to increase frequency and reduce fares. Providing frequent connections between the park and the rest of the regional transit system can be an effective way of bringing people to the park.

In addition to tranportation to the mall, PARD is exploring transportation within the park through park circulator options.

Driving Network and Roadways

Today the park access and experience is shaped by the roadway network, largely servicing small parking lots scattered throughout the park, with Barton Spring Road as a major barrier dividing north and south. The Zilker Park Vision Plan is exploring opportunities to rethink which of these roadways are critical connections and ways to improve the ability to connect across the park.

Parking Network

Any roadway suggestion would need to be carefully coordinated with the parking strategy as most of the roadways connect to parking areas. Currently, some of these areas are also ecological concerns, such as the Polo Fields and the landfill site. For the park overall, one concept could be to consolidate parking options within the park to reduce the overall footprint of roads and parking areas, which could support ecological goals of removing impervious surface and expanding green space.

There may also be opportunities to better share parking resources. Individual parking spaces can serve multiple user types if demand is at different times of day or day of week, depending on park access demand. Immediately adjacent parking resources can be explored as parking options for Zilker Park, although any off-site parking strategy would also need to be coupled with a multi-modal circulation strategy that guarantees accessibility and functions well for park visitors.

 

Question title

What are you most curious in exploring further regarding Mobility, Connectivity and Transportation?

Active transportation (non-vehicular) options throughout park
47%
Land bridge and underpass options
35%
Circulator options from outside the park to inside and back
34%
Reducing parking options inside the park
34%
Exploring shared parking options outside the park
33%
Barton Springs Road options
21%
Circulator options within the park
17%
Expanding parking options inside the park
14%
Stratford Drive options
11%
Other
4%
Closed to responses | 414 Responses

Question title

Exploring active transportation through the park: Paths for non-vehicular traffic through the park are limited to nature trails or shared use with vehicular traffic. What options should the Zilker Vision team explore for safer active transportation through the park?

Additional unpaved trails through park
54%
Leave it as it is
16%
Additional designated bike lanes
13%
Additional paved sidewalks through park
10%
Other ideas, including combinations of above options
7%
Closed to responses | 459 Responses

Question title

Do you think there should be specified pick-up and drop-off zones for ride share options?

Yes
75%
Unsure
13%
No
12%
Closed to responses | 476 Responses

Question title

Do you think there should be a circulator within and/or to Zilker Park to move people around different destinations within the Park and from the future light rail stop?

Yes, I would like to see this happen
47%
I need more information
36%
No, I do not want to see this happen
17%
Closed to responses | 478 Responses

Question title

The Zilker mini-train is set to return as the Zilker Eagle this year. Traditionally the route has included one location for pick-up and drop-off. Other parks use mini-trains as park circulators with expanded routes and multiple stops.

Should the Zilker Eagle be further explored as a circulator throughout the park with multiple stops?

Yes
73%
No
15%
Unsure
12%
Closed to responses | 481 Responses

Question title

Additional Thoughts
Please share any comments for Zilker Park overall. (Additional comment opportunities available on the following pages)

Closed for Comments