Prioridades generales

El plan de visión de Zilker Park es un rompecabezas complicado con muchas piezas. Cada una de las piezas, o alternativas de diseño, podría moldearse de diversas formas. Su opinión conducirá la dirección del plan y cómo el rompecabezas finalmente se ensambla.

Question title

En general, hay tres estrategias organizativas amplias. Cuanto más concentrado, más fácil es proporcionar servicios e instalaciones centrales, pero pone más carga en estas áreas. Un enfoque disperso comparte la carga en todo el parque, pero puede requerir más carreteras, estacionamiento y servicios públicos para atender cada área.

¿Cómo le gustaría que se distribuyera la programación en el parque?

Nodes: Create areas of activity within the park, and utilize some of the underused parts of the park for park programming, while keeping other spaces for less activity
49%
Leave the Zilker Park programming as it is today
24%
Dispersed: Evenly distribute programming throughout the park, utilizing as much of the park as possible for programming
14%
Concentrated: toward the east end of the park, near the pool and Great Lawn
11%
Other
2%
Closed to responses | 740 Responses

Question title

¿Le gustaría tener opciones de comida y vendedores en Zilker?

Yes, but limited to 1 or 2 areas
46%
No
29%
Yes, multiple options throughout the park
21%
Unsure
3%
Other
1%
Closed to responses | 870 Responses

Prioridades del parque Zilker por zona

Comenzando con preguntas sobre deseos alrededor de cada una de las zonas identificadas en el mapa interactivo de Zilker, identifique sus preferencias generales para cada área identificada a continuación.

Mapa del parque Zilker con las zonas A a G

Question title

(A) Zona de reserva natural: ¿Qué opciones está más interesado en explorar?

New trail entrance(s) to the Preserve
45%
Access to the lake in this zone
37%
Leave it as it is. Don't change anything.
29%
New entrance to the Austin Nature and Science Center in this zone
25%
Options with Stratford Drive in this zone
7%
Other ideas
6%
Closed to responses | 774 Responses

Question title

(B) Zona MoPac: ¿Qué opciones está más interesado en explorar?

Non-vehicular/active transportation paths
41%
Improvements on and around Roberta Crenshaw Bridge and Butler Hike and Bike Trail connections
40%
Managing invasive plant species under MoPac
38%
Formalizing parking in the area north of Stratford Drive
25%
Activating southern area next to Nature Center Drive with park programming, parking, lighting, or other elements
21%
Formal or informal gateway as visitors and commuters enter park area from MoPac feeder road
19%
Entrance to the Austin Nature and Science Center
16%
Leave it as it is. Don't change anything.
10%
Other ideas
5%
Closed to responses | 768 Responses

Question title

(C) ZBG Zone: ¿Qué opciones estás más interesado en explorar?

Changes to landfill area by removing waste materials or adding soil
49%
Non-vehicular/active transportation paths
39%
Formalizing parking in this area
23%
Puerta de entrada formal o informal cuando la gente ingresa al parque desde Stratford Drive o Roberta Crenshaw Bridge
18%
Leave it as it is. Don't change anything.
11%
Traffic options on Stratford Drive
11%
Other ideas
9%
Closed to responses | 714 Responses

Question title

(D) Great Lawn Zone: ¿Qué opciones estás más interesado en explorar?

Non-vehicular/active transportation paths
34%
New active transportation/non-vehicular connection across Lady Bird Lake
30%
Eliminating or changing vehicular traffic and parking on Lou Neff Road
30%
Leave it as it is. Don't change anything.
27%
New active transportation/non-vehicular extending Toomey Road across Barton Creek
23%
Visitor Hub options between Great Lawn and Barton Springs Road
18%
Increasing parking in this area.
10%
Other ideas
9%
Closed to responses | 722 Responses

Question title

(E) Polo Field Zone (incluida Barton Springs Road): ¿Qué opciones está más interesado en explorar?

Additional safe crossings on, under, or over Barton Springs Road
46%
Creating a field area for active or passive recreation like the Great Lawn
44%
Naturalizing Polo Field area
30%
Non-vehicular/active transportation paths
27%
Decreasing parking in this zone
23%
Puerta de entrada formal o informal cuando visitantes ingresan al parque Zilker en Barton Springs Road
16%
Options for vehicular and active transportation traffic on Barton Springs Road
11%
Leave it as it is. Don't change anything.
10%
Increasing parking in this zone
8%
Other ideas
5%
Closed to responses | 715 Responses

Question title

(F) Zona de Barton Springs: ¿Qué opciones está más interesado en explorar?

Ways for increasing ecological function
51%
Improving banks of Barton Creek in Barton Creek overflow ("Barking Springs") area
49%
Non-vehicular/active transportation paths.
30%
Decreasing parking in this zone.
18%
Visitor hub options at Zilker Cottage or Quonset Hut or new space nearby
16%
Puerta de entrada formal o informal en el lado sur de Barton Springs Pool cerca de Azie Morton Rd.
16%
Leave it as it is. Don't change anything.
10%
Increasing parking in this zone.
9%
Vehicular and active transportation traffic options on William Barton Dr. and Andrew Zilker Rd.
8%
Other ideas
7%
Closed to responses | 710 Responses

Question title

(G) Trailhead Zone: ¿Qué opciones está más interesado en explorar?

Increasing ecological function
61%
Non-vehicular/active transportation paths
34%
Leave it as it is. Don't change anything.
16%
Visitor hub options in this area including the Girl Scout Hut as an option
16%
Reducing parking in this area.
15%
Puerta de entrada formal o informal cerca de la entrada occidental en Columbus Dr.
13%
Increasing parking in this area.
9%
Vehicular and active transportation traffic options on Andrew Zilker Rd. and Columbus Dr.
7%
Other ideas
5%
Closed to responses | 641 Responses

Question title

Pensamientos adicionales
Comparta cualquier comentario sobre Zilker Park en general. (Quedan oportunidades adicionales para cada tema de página).

Closed for Comments