C20-2023-020 Zoning Application Processes and Deadlines was approved by City Council on Oct. 19, 2023

 

Background

On June 8, 2023, City Council approved Resolution No. 20230608-078 directing staff to create a six-month pilot program that extends certain deadlines related to zoning and rezoning applications.  

 

Summary of Proposed Amendment

The following are proposed amendments to City Code Title 25-2 to create a six-month pilot program modifying certain deadlines related to zoning and rezoning applications. The six-month pilot program is proposed to extend deadlines, as follows:  

  1. The deadline for a Land Use Commission to hold a public hearing after an application is filed will extend from 60 days to 120 days.  
  2. The deadline for City Council to hold a public hearing after the Land Use Commission makes a recommendation will extend from 40 days to 80 days. 

  3. An application expiration will extend from 181 days to 362 days after it is filed if a public hearing before a Land Use Commission has not been scheduled. 

  4. An application expiration will extend from 181 days to 362 days after it is filed if the Land Use Commission or City Council grants an indefinite postponement.

Neighborhood plan amendment and rezoning and zoning applications are often submitted and approved concurrently. To align neighborhood plan amendment application deadlines with zoning and rezoning application deadlines amendments to City Code Title 25-1 to create a six-month pilot program modifying certain deadlines related to neighborhood plan amendments are proposed as follows:  

  1. The deadline for a Land Use Commission to hold a public hearing after an application is filed will extend from 90 days to 120 days.   
  2. The deadline for City Council to hold a public hearing after the Land Use Commission makes a recommendation will extend from 40 to 80 days.  
  3. An application expiration will extend from 181 days to 362 days after it is filed if a public hearing before a Land Use Commission has not been scheduled.  
  4. An application expiration will extend from 181 days to 362 days after it is filed if the Land Use Commission or City Council grants an indefinite postponement. 

The pilot program will expire six months after the commencement date as specified in the adopted ordinance unless the City Council or City Manager deems it necessary to terminate the program before that date. Before deciding on an extension or termination, the Planning Commission and City Council will conduct a required review of the pilot program. Additionally, a status update must be provided to the Planning Commission three months following the adoption of the pilot program. If an extension is deemed necessary, an item will be placed on the City Council agenda prior to the expiration date in the Ordinance to consider extending the pilot program for an additional six months.  

To ensure the success of the pilot program, process improvements will be implemented, and staff efficiency will be enhanced to reduce staff workload. Operations will also be streamlined, and policies revised to integrate neighborhood plan amendments and zoning case information into meeting backup materials and agenda postings.   

To maximize the efficiency of the pilot program, priority for meeting room reservations will be given to the Land Use Commission meetings, including make-up dates that may occur on nontraditional meeting days. This prioritization will help ensure that public hearings are conducted in a timely manner, with the exception of City Council meetings.   

 

Review and Adoption Timeline

Sept. 26, 2023: Unanimously recommended for approval by the Planning Commission (with amendments) 

Click here to view the Staff Report, Draft Redline, and Presentation

Oct. 19, 2023: Approved by City Council on a 10-0-1 vote

 

Case Manager Contact

Jordan Feldman, Planning Department, Jordan.Feldman@austintexas.gov

Question title

Submit a Comment/Question
Your input is important to us. If you have a question or comment, please don't hesitate to let us know using the form below.

The crosswalk across Rio at this design looks potentially dangerous. Cars turning Left out of Belvedere would be focused on passing 2 lanes of westbound Rio traffic, then immediately would be on top of a crosswalk just as they have accelerated across Rio. There appears to be too...See More
Reply9 Agree3 years ago
If the circle at JWP and Rio Rd provides for the constant flow of traffic, it seems that trying to make a left turn out of Belvedere will be even more difficult, given there will be no traffic light to provide a break in traffic, especially at busy times of the day.
Reply8 Agree3 years ago
While the safety lane for vehicles turning left from Belvedere is an improvement, vehicles still have to cross two lanes of westbound Rio Road traffic to get to the safety lane. While I avoid the Belvedere/Rio intersection when heading to the parkway (I drive through Dunlora to ...See More
Reply6 Agree3 years ago
I'm most concerned about pedestrians. As cars turning left out of Belvedere focus on passing 2 lanes of traffic, will they remember to look to the right for pedestrians crossing in front of them? What about the crosswalk across Rio? Will cars in the slip lane see someone in that ...See More
Reply4 Agree3 years ago
How was peak load issues entering and exiting Belvedere Blvd for bigger events at SOCA, FairView, and The Center taken into account? In meetings a few years ago when representatives of all these organizations plus other area stakeholders was held with VDOT and Albemarle county s...See More
Reply4 Agree3 years ago