21-23 season setting rulemaking results Deer

Move Filter by Segment Options
WAC 220-415-030 2021 Deer special permits.
on the islands, modern firearms are not legal so the any weapon won't work
ReplyAgree4 years ago
Need to manage wildlife for all of the population of the state not just hunters who are only 5% of the total population but dominate wildlife decisions.
ReplyAgree4 years ago
None
ReplyAgree4 years ago
Agree with all but eliminating the special draw for the 1040
ReplyAgree4 years ago
Where is the proposal to legalize the use of dogs to locate downed game??? And what about the deadhead law? It is rendered pointless after the salvage law changes
ReplyAgree4 years ago
Move Filter by Segment Options
WAC 220-415-020 2021-2023 Deer general seasons and definitions.
Loading Comments
Move Filter by Segment Options
WAC 220-415-010 Deer area descriptions.
Deer Regulations: Support Proposals


 



Issue 1: Support Whitetail deer APR in GMU’s 101, 105, 108, 111, 113, 117, 121

Alternative #3 - 3 point minimum. Make these GMU’s match the regulation to the south. It does not make sense to complicate the matter further.

Issue 2: Support reduction of harvest of at risk whitetail does.

Let the science inform the policy.

Issue 3: Support reduction of harvest of at risk mule deer does.

Let the science inform the policy.

Issue 4: Support reducing antlerless white-tailed deer harvest in GMU 124.

Remove archery and muzzleloader general seasons.

Issue 6: Support opening GMU’s 247, 254, 262, 266, 269 to early general muzzleloader season.
Issue 7: Support eliminating all harvest of at risk mule deer in the East Columbia Gorge Mule Deer MZ.
Issue 8: Support opportunity to increase Black-tailed deer population on Puget Sound Islands.
Issue 10: Support elimination of deer area 1040.

 


 


Deer Regulations: OPPOSE Proposals


 



Issue 5: Oppose elimination of deer area 1021.

Make this a permit application and keep making revenue on a limited use opportunity with very low impact to a large mule deer population.
ReplyAgree3 years ago
I only disagree with elimination of the 1040 area. More comments on the elk area.
ReplyAgree4 years ago
None
ReplyAgree4 years ago
There is no reason to not have state land that offers a quality hunting experience. Increasing the tag numbers in the special draw would be a much better option than opening the wildlife area completely for deer and elk hunting. Your justification for opening the 4 0 really doesn't hold any ground as the tribal season goes for months where yours is only a week.
ReplyAgree4 years ago
Shaking my head still!! MAKE THE NATIVES HUNT WITH BOWS JUST LIKE THEIR ANCESTORS DID!
ReplyAgree4 years ago