Mayo Bridge Replacement Project CIM Comment Sheet 2026
Mayo Bridge Replacement Project CIM Comment Sheet 2026
A citizen information meeting was held on Oct. 21, 2026, from 5-7 p.m. at the Plan RVA Office located at 424 Hull Street, Suite 300, Richmond, VA 23224. Provide your comments regarding the Mayo Bridge Replacement project by November 1, 2026. All comments submitted by the deadline will become a part of the meeting transcript.
Visit the Mayo Bridge Replacement project webpage for additional information.
Mayo Bridge Replacement Project Comments
1. Name (Optional):
2. Address (Optional)
3. Which of the following best describes your interest in this project? (Choose all that apply)
4. The proposed layout provides connections to Pipeline Access Trail, Richmond Slave Trail, and Wall Loop Trail north and south of the river. Do you support providing connections to the existing trails?
4a. Please provide your reasoning:
5. The proposed layout includes bike lanes connecting into 14th Street (north of the bridge) and Route 360 (south of the bridge) Do you support how this project connects to the existing roads as shown?
5a. Please provide your reasoning:
6. The proposed layout shows a channelizing barrier on the bridge along the buffer between the bike lane and the vehicle lane on both sides. Do you support providing the dedicated bike lanes with the proposed channelizing barrier as shown?
6a. Please provide your reasoning:
7. The proposed typical bridge section shows 11-foot sidewalks on both sides of the bridge, providing equal sidewalk widths. Do you support providing equal sidewalk widths on both sides of the proposed bridge?
7a. Please provide your reasoning:
8. The displays include a rendering of the bridge across the James River showing the elevation from the north bank to the south bank. Do you consider this display adequate to understand the proposed bridge elevation (side-view)?
8a. Please provide your reasoning:
9. The proposed layout shows the proposed Mayo Park Phase 1 that is under construction, showing how the proposed bridge will impact the proposed park. Do you consider this display adequate to understand how the proposed project will connect to the proposed and future phases of Mayo Park?
9a. Please provide your reasoning:
10. The proposed bridge elevation shows dark-sky compliant lighting caps on the proposed streetlamps, limiting light pollution in the night sky. Do you support inclusion of dark-sky compliant caps on the streetlamps?
10a. Please provide your reasoning:
11. The displays include a rendering of the bridge across the James River showing the elevation from the north bank to the south bank showing streetlamps spaced evenly with two lamps per span. Do you consider this display adequate to understand the proposed streetlamp spacing?
11a. Please provide your reasoning:
12. The proposed typical bridge section and renderings show a concrete railing with openings to allow a better view of the river through the railing than available with the existing railing. Do you support changing the railing style to include openings?
12a. Please provide your reasoning:
13. The proposed layout shows Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon (PHB) at the intersection on Mayo Island for the pedestrian crossing so vehicles are notified that there are pedestrians who want to cross the street. Do you support adding PHB signals for pedestrian crossings?
13a. Please provide your reasoning:
14. Do you support the overall proposed project concept?
14a. Please provide your reasoning:
15. Did you find sufficient information was provided during the meeting to understand the general intent of the project?
16. How did you hear about this meeting?
This is hidden text that lets us know when google translate runs.