Skip Navigation

Mayo Bridge Replacement Project Comment Sheet

Mayo Bridge Replacement Project Comment Sheet

Use this online form to provide your comments by Friday, October 11, 2024. 

 

Provide your comments regarding the Mayo Bridge Replacement Project Citizen Information Meeting held on Tuesday, Sept. 17, from 5-7 p.m. at the Plan RVA Office located at 424 Hull Street, Suite 300, Richmond, VA 23224. 

All comments submitted will become a part of the meeting trasncript and will be made available to the public. 

Visit the Mayo Bridge Replacement project webpage for additional information or to access a printable version of this comment form.

 

 

1. Name (Optional):

Closed to responses

2. Zip code (Optional)

Closed for Comments

3. Which of the following best describes your interest in this project? (Choose all that apply)

I am a frequent non-motorist (walk, cycle, etc.) of the Mayo Bridge.
70%
I am a frequent motorist (car, bus, etc.) of the Mayo Bridge.
43%
I own or rent residential property on or near the Mayo Bridge/Mayo Island.
23%
Other (Please specify)
18%
I am an owner/employee of a business that is located on or near the Mayo. Bridge/Mayo Island
10%
Closed to responses | 552 Responses

4. Do you support reducing the number of travel lanes from two lanes to one lane in each direction (4 total to 2 total)? (Please see Question #5 below to provide a reason for your answer)

Yes
85%
No
15%
Closed to responses | 588 Responses

5. Please specify your reason for Question #4:

Closed for Comments

6. Would reducing the number of travel lanes from two lanes to one lane in each direction (4 total to 2 total) affect your morning and evening commute?

No
65%
Not Applicable
19%
Yes
16%
Closed to responses | 579 Responses

7. Do you support assigning the outside two lanes as managed lanes (no cars allowed, only cyclists and transit) during non-peak hours? (Please see Question #8 below to provide a reason for your answer)

Yes
70%
No
30%
Closed to responses | 561 Responses

8. Please specify your reason for Question #7:

Closed for Comments

9. Do you have concerns about the “Option 1 – Two-Sided Protected Recreation Area” concept? (Please see Question #10 below to provide a reason for your answer)

9. Do you have concerns about the Option 1 Two-Sided Protected Recreation Area concept? (Please see Question #10 below to provide a reason for your answer)
Yes
66%
No
34%
Closed to responses | 488 Responses

10. Please specify your reason for Question #9.

Closed for Comments

11. Do you have concerns about the “Option 2 – One-Sided Protected Recreation Area” concept? (Please see Question #12 below to provide a reason for your answer)

11. Do you have concerns about the Option 2 One-Sided Protected Recreation Area concept? (Please see Question #12 below to provide a reason for your answer)
Yes
75%
No
25%
Closed to responses | 464 Responses

12. Please specify your reason for Question # 11:

Closed for Comments

13. Do you have concerns about the “Option 3 – Widened Sidewalks” concept? (Please see Question #14 below to provide a reason for your answer)

13. Do you have concerns about the Option 3 Widened Sidewalks concept? (Please see Question #14 below to provide a reason for your answer)
Yes
73%
No
27%
Closed to responses | 449 Responses

14. Please specify your reason for Question #13:

Closed for Comments

15. Which of the concepts presented do you feel best meets the needs of the community? (Please see Question #16 below to provide a reason for your answer)

Option 1 – Two-Sided Protected Recreation Area
77%
Option 3 – Widened Sidewalks
14%
Option 2 – One-Sided Protected Recreation Area
9%
Closed to responses | 433 Responses

16. Please specify your reason for Question #15:

Closed for Comments

17. Which bridge width do you feel best meets the needs of the community? (Please see Question #18 to provide a reason for your answer)

Wider Section: 76 ft wide, $193M - $203M estimated cost
84%
Minimum Section: 66 ft wide, $168M - $178M estimated cost
16%
Closed to responses | 440 Responses

18. Please specify your reason for Question #17:

Closed for Comments

19. Did you find sufficient information was provided during the Citizen Information Meeting to understand the general options being considered? (Please see Question #20 below to provide a reason for your answer)

I did not attend the Citizen Information Meeting
80%
Yes
13%
No
7%
Closed to responses | 448 Responses

20. Please specify your reason for Question #19:

Closed for Comments

21. How did you hear about this meeting? (Check all that apply)

Social Media
51%
Friend
33%
Other (Please specify)
26%
Newspaper
4%
VDOT Roadway Sign
1%
Closed to responses | 406 Responses