Crozet Master Plan Conservation

Move Filter by Segment Options
Project Engagement
Views 703
Participants 59
Responses 579
Comments 157
Move Toggle Comments Filter by Segment Options
Should we prioritize the protection of certain streams, or provide additional incentives to protect certain streams in Crozet? And if so, how?
Move Toggle Comments Filter by Segment Options
  • 2963%Density incentives for retention or restoration of additional buffer area along streams in new development or redevelopment
  • 2861%Density incentives for preservation of existing tree cover in new development or redevelopment
  • 2554%Financial incentives for property owners to add vegetation or water quality best management practices along waterways
  • 2350%Density incentives for provision of native plantings in new development or redevelopment
  • 37%Other
46 Respondents
our area cannot support higher density, including increased traffic and school overcrowding.
Reply1 Agree4 years ago
absolutely not. Traffic and increased numbers in our schools without supporting infrastructure changes are primary reasons why
Reply1 Agree4 years ago
I support the change in designation to neighborhood density residential in keeping with the character of the area. But do not support further development until traffic, transportation and community infrastructure is in place.
ReplyAgree4 years ago
That density level will not create enough revenue for a developer to build that section of the eastern bypass, leaving it in the hands of the taxpayers to complete. Making this vacant parcel middle density might give enough reason for a developer to actually want to finish the bypass.
ReplyAgree4 years ago
Absolutely not, the developers do not need more land to build, everyone gave feedback that we need to maintain greenspace and no homes should be built above the master plan (it should be reduced, if anything because our infrastructure was never meant for this).
ReplyAgree4 years ago
Move Toggle Comments Options
our area cannot support higher density, including increased traffic and school overcrowding.
Reply1 Agree4 years ago
absolutely not. Traffic and increased numbers in our schools without supporting infrastructure changes are primary reasons why
Reply1 Agree4 years ago
I support the change in designation to neighborhood density residential in keeping with the character of the area. But do not support further development until traffic, transportation and community infrastructure is in place.
ReplyAgree4 years ago
That density level will not create enough revenue for a developer to build that section of the eastern bypass, leaving it in the hands of the taxpayers to complete. Making this vacant parcel middle density might give enough reason for a developer to actually want to finish the bypass.
ReplyAgree4 years ago
Absolutely not, the developers do not need more land to build, everyone gave feedback that we need to maintain greenspace and no homes should be built above the master plan (it should be reduced, if anything because our infrastructure was never meant for this).
ReplyAgree4 years ago
Move Filter by Segment Options
Do you have any other suggestions for how Crozet can support sustainability and the County's climate action planning goals?
Preserve all existing natural areas. Reduce individual motor vehicle use, and encourage using Crozet Connect.
Reply3 Agree4 years ago
Encouraging walking/cycling to schools to decrease vehicular traffic. Preserve existing forested areas. Safer bicycle routes/lanes.
Reply3 Agree4 years ago
Support students walking to school and make a community push in certain areas to do so instead of parents driving every day (when we return to a post-COVID world). Population and consumption affect the environment. analyze population density and restrict new builds as needed.
Reply3 Agree4 years ago
Yes! Stop clearing trees and building houses. Just stop with the building. In fact, maybe take some new houses out and plant trees. Add bike lanes, maybe, but no more houses.
Reply2 Agree4 years ago
Finishing Western Park at Old Trail will offer a variety of outdoor opportunities for families in the neighborhood and encourage more play outside along with enjoying nature.
Reply1 Agree4 years ago
Move Toggle Comments Filter by Segment Options
Should Western Park be the top priority for recreation improvements in Crozet?
Move Toggle Comments Filter by Segment Options
Do you use the Crozet Trails? If so, how often?
  • 1634%I use the Crozet Trails weekly.
  • 1021%I use the Crozet Trails on occasion (1-2 times per month).
  • 1021%I use the Crozet Trails daily.
  • 613%No, I have not used the Crozet Trails.
  • 511%I have used the Crozet Trails once or twice.
47 Respondents
our area cannot support higher density, including increased traffic and school overcrowding.
Reply1 Agree4 years ago
absolutely not. Traffic and increased numbers in our schools without supporting infrastructure changes are primary reasons why
Reply1 Agree4 years ago
I support the change in designation to neighborhood density residential in keeping with the character of the area. But do not support further development until traffic, transportation and community infrastructure is in place.
ReplyAgree4 years ago
That density level will not create enough revenue for a developer to build that section of the eastern bypass, leaving it in the hands of the taxpayers to complete. Making this vacant parcel middle density might give enough reason for a developer to actually want to finish the bypass.
ReplyAgree4 years ago
Absolutely not, the developers do not need more land to build, everyone gave feedback that we need to maintain greenspace and no homes should be built above the master plan (it should be reduced, if anything because our infrastructure was never meant for this).
ReplyAgree4 years ago
Loading more report objects...