Montopolis Pool Project Survey #2

Open June 21 through July 19, 2022
Move Filter by Segment Options
Project Engagement
Views 664
Participants 74
Responses 799
Comments 282
Move Toggle Comments Filter by Segment Options
47%
Option B
43%
Option A
6%
Neither
4%
No Preference
72 respondents
density incentives?? to allow for more density? I think that's not sustainable. We want our land to be able to support the needs of our community, if not in making the food but in allowing enough outside space for everyone.
Reply2 Agree4 years ago
Density incentives may only add to our water quality problems -- more land disturbance and more vehicle-related runoff. Since proffers are still permitted in connection with any particular project, it should be possible to impose protective landscaping on all developers.
ReplyAgree4 years ago
We need to find other incentive to protect tree cover rather than density. THe scorched earth development that is allowed is shameful. IF there is a plan for the development - it should protect as much of the tree and native planting as possible and those tree
s and native plants should be cordoned off. Yes it takes more effort - but the selling price could easily accommodate the extra value of not movng into a totally scraped bare environment.
ReplyAgree4 years ago
Our natural resources are primary not only to environmental health and sustainabilty, but also resilience and our identity. It should be treated as one of THE primary assets in the community.
ReplyAgree4 years ago
All of the above along with an option to purchase nutrient credits to meet bmp objectives
ReplyAgree4 years ago
Move Filter by Segment Options
51 responses
Move Filter by Segment Options
I really like the shade structures
Reply1 Agree2 years ago
The large picnic area.
Reply1 Agree2 years ago
The large picnic area
Reply1 Agree2 years ago
The amount of green area for lounging
Reply1 Agree2 years ago
Rain water
Reply1 Agree2 years ago
Move Filter by Segment Options
The pool opening up to the picnic area makes more sense
Reply2 Agree2 years ago
The picnic area is close to the shallow entry which makes more sense than ha ing it next to the deep end/lap swim section
Reply2 Agree2 years ago
The shading and longer shallow entry which is perfect for toddlers and children who can't swim & picnic area.
Reply1 Agree2 years ago
The big picnic area.
Reply1 Agree2 years ago
The shade structures are next to the zero-entry area and the slide. It feels like a better separation of a shaded family area to keep kids out of the sun.
Reply1 Agree2 years ago
Move Filter by Segment Options
Definitely needs as much shade lining the deck as possible. It’s just not safe otherwise.
Reply1 Agree2 years ago
SHADE
Reply1 Agree2 years ago
More shade and play features in the pool were included in the presentation.
Reply1 Agree2 years ago
Splash pad features, more shade, shaded seating around zero entry pool.
Reply1 Agree2 years ago
Add the rain water system to Option B, maybe place it on the
Reply1 Agree2 years ago
Move Filter by Segment Options
I want to feel like the Montopolis pool is my first choice community pool, that the pool is on-par with other Austin pools.
Reply3 Agree2 years ago
I want to feel that i'm going to have fun with my kids. Just like I had fun
ReplyAgree2 years ago
I would like a sense of community including the past and the present.
ReplyAgree2 years ago
community
ReplyAgree2 years ago
fun and options for everyone in my family; shade to hang out in, feeling a part of historic black and brown community
ReplyAgree2 years ago
Loading more report objects...