Do you support the addition of these new Future Land Use categories?
67% No
33% Yes
Weighted by
Weight Results
18 respondents
Do you support the addition of these new Future Land Use categories?
We need to preserve as much greenspace as possible to avoid degradation of the natural ecosystem services that it provides. I'm opposed to any increases in population density.
I oppose any change in designation that would support greater density in this area , or that would remove green space. Even "wild" green space has tremendous value for our health and that of our ecosystem and planet, including filtering ground water, buffering sound and light pollution and absorbing carbon dioxide.
the increase in traffic in Park Ridge Drive corridor needs to be looked at first. Without a date for the 250 connector in the future, this should be a non starter
While it is a priority of mine to have the trailway connect through this area, I oppose encouraging additional densities that high so far from downtown.
This area is completely detached from the rest of crozet. A public greenway trail spur along the stream buffer back to the main lickinghole creek trail system would make this proposal a little easier to support.
Do you support the updated Greenspace categories described above?
83% No
17% Yes
Weighted by
Weight Results
12 respondents
Do you support the updated Greenspace categories described above?
We need to preserve as much greenspace as possible to avoid degradation of the natural ecosystem services that it provides. I'm opposed to any increases in population density.
I oppose any change in designation that would support greater density in this area , or that would remove green space. Even "wild" green space has tremendous value for our health and that of our ecosystem and planet, including filtering ground water, buffering sound and light pollution and absorbing carbon dioxide.
the increase in traffic in Park Ridge Drive corridor needs to be looked at first. Without a date for the 250 connector in the future, this should be a non starter
While it is a priority of mine to have the trailway connect through this area, I oppose encouraging additional densities that high so far from downtown.
This area is completely detached from the rest of crozet. A public greenway trail spur along the stream buffer back to the main lickinghole creek trail system would make this proposal a little easier to support.
Do you support the updated Mixed Use and Center designations described above?
58% Yes
42% No
Weighted by
Weight Results
12 respondents
Do you support the updated Mixed Use and Center designations described above?
Do not support the designation of M4 or development in that area without first seeing concrete plans to significantly improve transportation and community infrastructure.
I don't have enough information to say yes definitely. I do believe that all neighborhoods should have some walkable amenities available to them but I would like to see what sorts of businesses would be allowed before agreeing to support. I would like to see the largest hub being the downtown Crozet pedestrian mall.
No more residential homes (or mixed use). Businesses are fine, but no more homes/residential dwellings! Old Trail is already a disaster with speeders flying through on OT drive. Adding more opportunity for people to come in and out (and more patrons/residents, parking and walking in and out of these businesses) will only prove to be more dangerous. I realize that this is likely not the place for this , but I think the Committee understands my point. Crozet is already OVERCROWDED and adding more people by way of places to live, is a disaster. Where will these kids go to school? Where will the cars drive? the "affordable" housing isn't affordable so please don't add more! Thank you!
The draft plan includes a split land use designation for White Gate Farm (TMP 56E-2). This designation aims to continue the pattern of development currently in Wickham Pond. Changing this property's designation would support broader housing choices within Crozet and infill development that connects the Park Ridge Drive corridor to Crozet's easternmost neighborhoods.
An increase of 49-143 additional units over the 2010 Master Plan could be developed under the revised designation.
81% No
19% Yes
Weighted by
Weight Results
16 respondents
The draft plan includes a split land use designation for White Gate Farm (TMP 56E-2). This designation aims to continue the pattern of development currently in Wickham Pond. Changing this property's designation would support broader housing choices within Crozet and infill development that connects the Park Ridge Drive corridor to Crozet's easternmost neighborhoods. <br><br>An increase of 49-143 additional units over the 2010 Master Plan could be developed under the revised designation.
We need to preserve as much greenspace as possible to avoid degradation of the natural ecosystem services that it provides. I'm opposed to any increases in population density.
I oppose any change in designation that would support greater density in this area , or that would remove green space. Even "wild" green space has tremendous value for our health and that of our ecosystem and planet, including filtering ground water, buffering sound and light pollution and absorbing carbon dioxide.
the increase in traffic in Park Ridge Drive corridor needs to be looked at first. Without a date for the 250 connector in the future, this should be a non starter
While it is a priority of mine to have the trailway connect through this area, I oppose encouraging additional densities that high so far from downtown.
This area is completely detached from the rest of crozet. A public greenway trail spur along the stream buffer back to the main lickinghole creek trail system would make this proposal a little easier to support.
The draft plan designates parcels east of Eastern Avenue, south of Westhall Drive and north of Lickinghole Basin as Neighborhood Density Residential and Parks & Green Systems.
Development in this area has occurred at a lower density than shown in the 2010 Master Plan, and the Eastern Avenue corridor provides a boundary between areas with different development patterns. The portion of Urban Density Residential east of Eastern Avenue was changed to Neighborhood Density Residential to reflect current development and improve legibility of the land use map. The Greenspace boundary was also changed to reflect the actual location of environmental features.
An increase of 10-20 additional units over the 2010 Master Plan could be developed under the revised designation.
73% No
27% Yes
Weighted by
Weight Results
15 respondents
The draft plan designates parcels east of Eastern Avenue, south of Westhall Drive and north of Lickinghole Basin as Neighborhood Density Residential and Parks & Green Systems.<br><br>Development in this area has occurred at a lower density than shown in the 2010 Master Plan, and the Eastern Avenue corridor provides a boundary between areas with different development patterns. The portion of Urban Density Residential east of Eastern Avenue was changed to Neighborhood Density Residential to reflect current development and improve legibility of the land use map. The Greenspace boundary was also changed to reflect the actual location of environmental features. <br><br>An increase of 10-20 additional units over the 2010 Master Plan could be developed under the revised designation.
We need to preserve as much greenspace as possible to avoid degradation of the natural ecosystem services that it provides. I'm opposed to any increases in population density.
I oppose any change in designation that would support greater density in this area , or that would remove green space. Even "wild" green space has tremendous value for our health and that of our ecosystem and planet, including filtering ground water, buffering sound and light pollution and absorbing carbon dioxide.
the increase in traffic in Park Ridge Drive corridor needs to be looked at first. Without a date for the 250 connector in the future, this should be a non starter
While it is a priority of mine to have the trailway connect through this area, I oppose encouraging additional densities that high so far from downtown.
This area is completely detached from the rest of crozet. A public greenway trail spur along the stream buffer back to the main lickinghole creek trail system would make this proposal a little easier to support.
The draft Future Land Use Plan includes a change to TMP #56-13's Greenspace boundary to reflect the actual location of environmental features.
An increase of 23-46 additional units over the 2010 Master Plan could be developed under the revised designation.
86% No
14% Yes
Weighted by
Weight Results
14 respondents
The draft Future Land Use Plan includes a change to TMP #56-13's Greenspace boundary to reflect the actual location of environmental features. <br><br>An increase of 23-46 additional units over the 2010 Master Plan could be developed under the revised designation.
We need to preserve as much greenspace as possible to avoid degradation of the natural ecosystem services that it provides. I'm opposed to any increases in population density.
I oppose any change in designation that would support greater density in this area , or that would remove green space. Even "wild" green space has tremendous value for our health and that of our ecosystem and planet, including filtering ground water, buffering sound and light pollution and absorbing carbon dioxide.
the increase in traffic in Park Ridge Drive corridor needs to be looked at first. Without a date for the 250 connector in the future, this should be a non starter
While it is a priority of mine to have the trailway connect through this area, I oppose encouraging additional densities that high so far from downtown.
This area is completely detached from the rest of crozet. A public greenway trail spur along the stream buffer back to the main lickinghole creek trail system would make this proposal a little easier to support.
