Zilker Park Vision Plan Community Survey #5

Survey open February 15 through April 11, 2023
Move Filter by Segment Options
Project Engagement
Views 7,941
Participants 708
Responses 11,408
Comments 858
Move Filter by Segment Options
How well does each option achieve the overall guiding principles and goals?
616 responses
Move Toggle Comments Filter by Segment Options
Select the top 5 elements you like from Plan Concept A: Stitch?

Loading Data...
Move Filter by Segment Options
What is missing that you think would improve Plan Concept A?
Do nothing ! Get rid of ACL and Trail of Lights. No construction or earth moving please
Reply25 Agree3 years ago
Agree completely on sustaining and uplifting. However, the traffic/parking needs some bigger and greener thinking. Why would we build garages to entice yet more cars to an already congested downtown area? Where are the incentives to get people out of their cars and onto buses and connect walking/bike paths from ALL sides into the park (some of the proposals focus on this, but a comprehensive proposal for the external to the internal pathways should be included). Underpasses or bridges for pedestrations and cyclicts is a must. Protected bike paths everywhere are a must. Force cars to park at off-park locations and use shuttles or pathways to access park. Force cars to park away from the park, and limit parking and use that space to create more green space. Ask other cities (Seattle/Portland) how they have improved congested parkland in urban areas. Austin is primed to think bigger and more like the West Coast than other parts of Texas (in terms of leveraging those ideas in Austin).
Reply12 Agree3 years ago
Yes, discontinue ACL and Trial of Lights. Keep Wright Field, keep present off-leash areas. Enforce existing rules/laws. There are several school buses and other vehicles that have camped at Wright Field for the past 6 months. Rehire Park Police, Park Rangers are ineffective.
Reply4 Agree3 years ago
Zilker maybe can have three or so improvements but y’all want to much. Let austin have our zilker. Make your “improvements” on new green space. Stop destroying our last bit of true austin culture
Reply2 Agree3 years ago
Wright field and rugby field
Reply2 Agree3 years ago
Move Toggle Comments Options
All participants
Select the top 5 elements you like from Plan Concept B: Edges?
  • 1458%13. Additional pedestrian/bike bridge connections across Barton Creek
  • 1250%7. Pedestrian bridge at Toomey Road extension
  • 1146%9. Pedestrian/bike bridge across Lady Bird Lake to connect to Austin High area
  • 1042%3. Barton Springs Road underpass for pedestrian and bikes
  • 1042%10. Nature playground and new trailhead on west side of MoPac in Zilker Preserve
  • 833%4. Removal of vehicular traffic from Lou Neff
  • 833%5. Removal of vehicular traffic from Andrew Zilker Road
  • 625%6. Ecological uplift of Butler Landfill next to parking garage and Zilker Hillside Theater
  • 625%15. Stratford Drive realignment east of MoPac and closure of existing Stratford alignment to vehicular traffic
  • 417%1. Parking garages at the perimeter of the park
  • 313%14. New location of Zilker Hillside Theater (Landfill area)
  • 28%8. Barton Springs Road (2 lanes of traffic, on-street parking)
  • 28%11. Off leash dog area near Azie Morton Road / southern part of Zilker Park
  • 28%12. Playground in southern part of Zilker Park
  • 14%2. Sports complex at Polo Field lawn
  • 14%Other
24 Respondents
Move Filter by Segment Options
What is missing that you think would improve Plan Concept B?
Don't really love the idea of parallel parking along Barton Springs Rd. There is a certain charm to your visibility of the park as you drive through. With parking on either side, visual access would be broken from the street. To see people out playing frisbee or going for a run brings me happiness, even if I am driving to work and can't join in on the fun. To only see cars on your left and right as if it were South Congress would be a shame. You would lose the calming effect of seeing the fun and green space.
Reply23 Agree3 years ago
The land bridge! Accessible bike/ped crossings are so much better when above-ground, open to natural light and visibility. Also, Plan B includes too much new parking, and doesn't adequately support the City's mode-share goals.
Reply13 Agree3 years ago
Moving the theatre will seem to bring a lot of potential disruption to theatre attendees with mixing with people on the great lawn, their music, their dogs - seems like mixing a lot of people.
Reply13 Agree3 years ago
Invasive plant removal and rewilding with native plant species. Shuttles from south Austin.
Reply5 Agree3 years ago
more land restoration
Reply4 Agree3 years ago
Move Toggle Comments Filter by Segment Options
Select the top 5 elements you like from Plan Concept C: Regenerate?

Loading Data...
Loading more report objects...