Five Points Streetscape & Safety Study

Move Filter by Segment Options
Project Engagement
Views 1,823
Participants 579
Responses 14,622
Comments 1,160
Subscribers 152
Move Toggle Comments Filter by Segment Options
Please rank the following priorities for the Five Points Streetscape and Safety Study in order of importance (from top to bottom)
  • 448Rank: 1.6891%Improving safety
  • 412Rank: 2.5584%Improving walking and bicycling conditions
  • 393Rank: 3.1080%Reducing traffic speed
  • 394Rank: 3.2480%Addressing traffic congestion
  • 377Rank: 3.8577%Improving the look and feel of the intersection
492 Respondents
This is little to no change of what currently exists.. add the pedestrian buffers/paths to this and we may have something.
ReplyAgreeone year ago
The fact that this effort is being put into ONE intersection and not considering the areas around this intersection is ridiculous.
ReplyAgreeone year ago
Will this be enough to make measurable improvements?
ReplyAgreeone year ago
This will be ideal to keep cars speeding on Glenwood avenue. No benefits for pedestrians, bikes and alternative mobilities.
ReplyAgreeone year ago
This is barely a change and not useful to anyone but cars barreling through the area.
ReplyAgreeone year ago
Move Filter by Segment Options
Please select the extent to which you agree or disagree with the following statements about the intended benefits of each of the remaining Five Points intersection improvement concepts. (Click image to enlarge view)
434 responses
This is little to no change of what currently exists.. add the pedestrian buffers/paths to this and we may have something.
ReplyAgreeone year ago
The fact that this effort is being put into ONE intersection and not considering the areas around this intersection is ridiculous.
ReplyAgreeone year ago
Will this be enough to make measurable improvements?
ReplyAgreeone year ago
This will be ideal to keep cars speeding on Glenwood avenue. No benefits for pedestrians, bikes and alternative mobilities.
ReplyAgreeone year ago
This is barely a change and not useful to anyone but cars barreling through the area.
ReplyAgreeone year ago
Move Filter by Segment Options
Please select the extent to which you agree or disagree with the following statements about the intended benefits of each of the remaining Five Points intersection improvement concepts. (Click image to enlarge view)
429 responses
This is little to no change of what currently exists.. add the pedestrian buffers/paths to this and we may have something.
ReplyAgreeone year ago
The fact that this effort is being put into ONE intersection and not considering the areas around this intersection is ridiculous.
ReplyAgreeone year ago
Will this be enough to make measurable improvements?
ReplyAgreeone year ago
This will be ideal to keep cars speeding on Glenwood avenue. No benefits for pedestrians, bikes and alternative mobilities.
ReplyAgreeone year ago
This is barely a change and not useful to anyone but cars barreling through the area.
ReplyAgreeone year ago
Move Filter by Segment Options
Please select the extent to which you agree or disagree with the following statements about the intended benefits of each of the remaining Five Points intersection improvement concepts. (Click image to enlarge view)
415 responses
This is little to no change of what currently exists.. add the pedestrian buffers/paths to this and we may have something.
ReplyAgreeone year ago
The fact that this effort is being put into ONE intersection and not considering the areas around this intersection is ridiculous.
ReplyAgreeone year ago
Will this be enough to make measurable improvements?
ReplyAgreeone year ago
This will be ideal to keep cars speeding on Glenwood avenue. No benefits for pedestrians, bikes and alternative mobilities.
ReplyAgreeone year ago
This is barely a change and not useful to anyone but cars barreling through the area.
ReplyAgreeone year ago
Move Filter by Segment Options
Please share how much of a concern you would have about each of the concept's potential affect on the Five Points intersection. (Click image to enlarge view)
388 responses
This is little to no change of what currently exists.. add the pedestrian buffers/paths to this and we may have something.
ReplyAgreeone year ago
The fact that this effort is being put into ONE intersection and not considering the areas around this intersection is ridiculous.
ReplyAgreeone year ago
Will this be enough to make measurable improvements?
ReplyAgreeone year ago
This will be ideal to keep cars speeding on Glenwood avenue. No benefits for pedestrians, bikes and alternative mobilities.
ReplyAgreeone year ago
This is barely a change and not useful to anyone but cars barreling through the area.
ReplyAgreeone year ago
Move Filter by Segment Options
Please share how much of a concern you would have about each of the concept's potential affect on the Five Points intersection. (Click image to enlarge view)
389 responses
This is little to no change of what currently exists.. add the pedestrian buffers/paths to this and we may have something.
ReplyAgreeone year ago
The fact that this effort is being put into ONE intersection and not considering the areas around this intersection is ridiculous.
ReplyAgreeone year ago
Will this be enough to make measurable improvements?
ReplyAgreeone year ago
This will be ideal to keep cars speeding on Glenwood avenue. No benefits for pedestrians, bikes and alternative mobilities.
ReplyAgreeone year ago
This is barely a change and not useful to anyone but cars barreling through the area.
ReplyAgreeone year ago
Loading more report objects...