City of Raleigh, NC - Report Creation

Move Filter by Segment Options

Project Engagement

Participants 579

Responses 14,622

Comments 1,160

Subscribers 152

Move Toggle Comments Filter by Segment Options

Please rank the following priorities for the Five Points Streetscape and Safety Study in order of importance (from top to bottom)

448Rank: 1.6891%Improving safety
412Rank: 2.5584%Improving walking and bicycling conditions
393Rank: 3.1080%Reducing traffic speed
394Rank: 3.2480%Addressing traffic congestion
377Rank: 3.8577%Improving the look and feel of the intersection

492 Respondents

This plan must have pedestrian lights for walkers

Reply Agreeone year ago

There still needs to be some kind of protected or buffered bike lanes for this alternative.

Reply Agreeone year ago

This will surely speed on Glenwood avenue but I don't see protected bike lanes.

Reply Agreeone year ago

I love this plan and hope it is adopted. The single lane will slow the traffic down. I believe that of all the proposals, this one will improve the look and atmosphere of Five Points the most. Having a dedicated parking lane would be an big improvement for residents and businesses. I have concerns about bars in the area and the unpleasant side effects for residents.

Reply Agreeone year ago

I support this concept and believe it would solve the traffic related issues in Five Points. It would also eliminate the ugly traffic lights in the intersection which would be wonderful. I am a long-time resident who has never felt safe parking in front of my house (multiple cars hit over the years, ours and guests), I support this concept 100%. This concept would make Five Points attractive, something it has never been.

Reply Agreeone year ago

Move Filter by Segment Options

Please select the extent to which you agree or disagree with the following statements about the intended benefits of each of the remaining Five Points intersection improvement concepts. (Click image to enlarge view)

Strongly Agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

The concept will reduce traffic speeds.

5%

Strongly Agree

20%

Agree

45%

Disagree

30%

Strongly Disagree

The concept will improve traffic safety.

13%

Strongly Agree

37%

Agree

30%

Disagree

20%

Strongly Disagree

The concept will relieve traffic congestion.

9%

Strongly Agree

17%

Agree

51%

Disagree

24%

Strongly Disagree

The concept will improve the look and feel of the intersection.

6%

Strongly Agree

25%

Agree

42%

Disagree

26%

Strongly Disagree

The concept will improve walking and bicycling conditions.

9%

Strongly Agree

27%

Agree

36%

Disagree

29%

Strongly Disagree

434 responses

This plan must have pedestrian lights for walkers

Reply Agreeone year ago

There still needs to be some kind of protected or buffered bike lanes for this alternative.

Reply Agreeone year ago

This will surely speed on Glenwood avenue but I don't see protected bike lanes.

Reply Agreeone year ago

I love this plan and hope it is adopted. The single lane will slow the traffic down. I believe that of all the proposals, this one will improve the look and atmosphere of Five Points the most. Having a dedicated parking lane would be an big improvement for residents and businesses. I have concerns about bars in the area and the unpleasant side effects for residents.

Reply Agreeone year ago

I support this concept and believe it would solve the traffic related issues in Five Points. It would also eliminate the ugly traffic lights in the intersection which would be wonderful. I am a long-time resident who has never felt safe parking in front of my house (multiple cars hit over the years, ours and guests), I support this concept 100%. This concept would make Five Points attractive, something it has never been.

Reply Agreeone year ago

Move Filter by Segment Options

Please select the extent to which you agree or disagree with the following statements about the intended benefits of each of the remaining Five Points intersection improvement concepts. (Click image to enlarge view)

Strongly Agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

The concept will improve the look and feel of the intersection.

44%

Strongly Agree

41%

Agree

10%

Disagree

6%

Strongly Disagree

The concept will improve walking and bicycling conditions.

33%

Strongly Agree

39%

Agree

19%

Disagree

9%

Strongly Disagree

The concept will reduce traffic speeds.

46%

Strongly Agree

42%

Agree

6%

Disagree

6%

Strongly Disagree

The concept will relieve traffic congestion.

15%

Strongly Agree

34%

Agree

31%

Disagree

20%

Strongly Disagree

The concept will improve traffic safety.

33%

Strongly Agree

44%

Agree

13%

Disagree

10%

Strongly Disagree

429 responses

This plan must have pedestrian lights for walkers

Reply Agreeone year ago

There still needs to be some kind of protected or buffered bike lanes for this alternative.

Reply Agreeone year ago

This will surely speed on Glenwood avenue but I don't see protected bike lanes.

Reply Agreeone year ago

I love this plan and hope it is adopted. The single lane will slow the traffic down. I believe that of all the proposals, this one will improve the look and atmosphere of Five Points the most. Having a dedicated parking lane would be an big improvement for residents and businesses. I have concerns about bars in the area and the unpleasant side effects for residents.

Reply Agreeone year ago

I support this concept and believe it would solve the traffic related issues in Five Points. It would also eliminate the ugly traffic lights in the intersection which would be wonderful. I am a long-time resident who has never felt safe parking in front of my house (multiple cars hit over the years, ours and guests), I support this concept 100%. This concept would make Five Points attractive, something it has never been.

Reply Agreeone year ago

Move Filter by Segment Options

Please select the extent to which you agree or disagree with the following statements about the intended benefits of each of the remaining Five Points intersection improvement concepts. (Click image to enlarge view)

Strongly Agree

Agree

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

The concept will improve traffic safety.

16%

Strongly Agree

35%

Agree

28%

Disagree

21%

Strongly Disagree

The concept will improve walking and bicycling conditions.

17%

Strongly Agree

36%

Agree

28%

Disagree

20%

Strongly Disagree

The concept will improve the look and feel of the intersection.

26%

Strongly Agree

47%

Agree

14%

Disagree

13%

Strongly Disagree

The concept will relieve traffic congestion.

19%

Strongly Agree

31%

Agree

33%

Disagree

17%

Strongly Disagree

The concept will reduce traffic speeds.

17%

Strongly Agree

52%

Agree

17%

Disagree

14%

Strongly Disagree

415 responses

This plan must have pedestrian lights for walkers

Reply Agreeone year ago

There still needs to be some kind of protected or buffered bike lanes for this alternative.

Reply Agreeone year ago

This will surely speed on Glenwood avenue but I don't see protected bike lanes.

Reply Agreeone year ago

I love this plan and hope it is adopted. The single lane will slow the traffic down. I believe that of all the proposals, this one will improve the look and atmosphere of Five Points the most. Having a dedicated parking lane would be an big improvement for residents and businesses. I have concerns about bars in the area and the unpleasant side effects for residents.

Reply Agreeone year ago

I support this concept and believe it would solve the traffic related issues in Five Points. It would also eliminate the ugly traffic lights in the intersection which would be wonderful. I am a long-time resident who has never felt safe parking in front of my house (multiple cars hit over the years, ours and guests), I support this concept 100%. This concept would make Five Points attractive, something it has never been.

Reply Agreeone year ago

Move Filter by Segment Options

Please share how much of a concern you would have about each of the concept's potential affect on the Five Points intersection. (Click image to enlarge view)

Major Concern

Minor Concern

Not A Concern

The concept will reduce parking in the area.

14%

Major Concern

28%

Minor Concern

57%

Not A Concern

The concept will be too big of a change.

5%

Major Concern

11%

Minor Concern

85%

Not A Concern

The concept will be too costly.

8%

Major Concern

10%

Minor Concern

82%

Not A Concern

The concept will divert traffic to parallel streets.

13%

Major Concern

20%

Minor Concern

67%

Not A Concern

388 responses

This plan must have pedestrian lights for walkers

Reply Agreeone year ago

There still needs to be some kind of protected or buffered bike lanes for this alternative.

Reply Agreeone year ago

This will surely speed on Glenwood avenue but I don't see protected bike lanes.

Reply Agreeone year ago

I love this plan and hope it is adopted. The single lane will slow the traffic down. I believe that of all the proposals, this one will improve the look and atmosphere of Five Points the most. Having a dedicated parking lane would be an big improvement for residents and businesses. I have concerns about bars in the area and the unpleasant side effects for residents.

Reply Agreeone year ago

I support this concept and believe it would solve the traffic related issues in Five Points. It would also eliminate the ugly traffic lights in the intersection which would be wonderful. I am a long-time resident who has never felt safe parking in front of my house (multiple cars hit over the years, ours and guests), I support this concept 100%. This concept would make Five Points attractive, something it has never been.

Reply Agreeone year ago

Move Filter by Segment Options

Please share how much of a concern you would have about each of the concept's potential affect on the Five Points intersection. (Click image to enlarge view)

Major Concern

Minor Concern

Not A Concern

The concept will be too big of a change.

17%

Major Concern

30%

Minor Concern

52%

Not A Concern

The concept will reduce parking in the area.

15%

Major Concern

25%

Minor Concern

59%

Not A Concern

The concept will divert traffic to parallel streets.

20%

Major Concern

27%

Minor Concern

53%

Not A Concern

The concept will be too costly.

14%

Major Concern

27%

Minor Concern

58%

Not A Concern

389 responses

This plan must have pedestrian lights for walkers

Reply Agreeone year ago

There still needs to be some kind of protected or buffered bike lanes for this alternative.

Reply Agreeone year ago

This will surely speed on Glenwood avenue but I don't see protected bike lanes.

Reply Agreeone year ago

I love this plan and hope it is adopted. The single lane will slow the traffic down. I believe that of all the proposals, this one will improve the look and atmosphere of Five Points the most. Having a dedicated parking lane would be an big improvement for residents and businesses. I have concerns about bars in the area and the unpleasant side effects for residents.

Reply Agreeone year ago

I support this concept and believe it would solve the traffic related issues in Five Points. It would also eliminate the ugly traffic lights in the intersection which would be wonderful. I am a long-time resident who has never felt safe parking in front of my house (multiple cars hit over the years, ours and guests), I support this concept 100%. This concept would make Five Points attractive, something it has never been.

Reply Agreeone year ago

Five Points Streetscape & Safety Study

Project Engagement

Please rank the following priorities for the Five Points Streetscape and Safety Study in order of importance (from top to bottom)

Please rank the following priorities for the Five Points Streetscape and Safety Study in order of importance (from top to bottom)

Please select the extent to which you agree or disagree with the following statements about the intended benefits of each of the remaining Five Points intersection improvement concepts. (Click image to enlarge view)

Please select the extent to which you agree or disagree with the following statements about the intended benefits of each of the remaining Five Points intersection improvement concepts. (Click image to enlarge view)

Please select the extent to which you agree or disagree with the following statements about the intended benefits of each of the remaining Five Points intersection improvement concepts. (Click image to enlarge view)

Please select the extent to which you agree or disagree with the following statements about the intended benefits of each of the remaining Five Points intersection improvement concepts. (Click image to enlarge view)

Please select the extent to which you agree or disagree with the following statements about the intended benefits of each of the remaining Five Points intersection improvement concepts. (Click image to enlarge view)

Please select the extent to which you agree or disagree with the following statements about the intended benefits of each of the remaining Five Points intersection improvement concepts. (Click image to enlarge view)

Please share how much of a concern you would have about each of the concept's potential affect on the Five Points intersection. (Click image to enlarge view)

Please share how much of a concern you would have about each of the concept's potential affect on the Five Points intersection. (Click image to enlarge view)

Please share how much of a concern you would have about each of the concept's potential affect on the Five Points intersection. (Click image to enlarge view)

Please share how much of a concern you would have about each of the concept's potential affect on the Five Points intersection. (Click image to enlarge view)